Gov. Kathy Hochul faces criticism for greenlighting tolling program despite opposition, set to launch in January.
Governor Kathy Hochul of New York recently announced the revival of congestion pricing, a move that has been welcomed by transportation and environmental advocates. The plan aims to reduce traffic congestion, improve air quality, and enhance mass transit systems. However, the decision has also reignited opposition from various quarters, including the incoming U.S. president, congressional Republicans, and the Democratic governor of New Jersey.
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority board, responsible for implementing the toll program, approved the plan with a 12-to-1 vote. The scheme will involve charging most drivers $9 to access the busiest part of Manhattan and is set to commence in early January.
Governor Hochul had initially put congestion pricing on hold in June due to concerns about its economic impact on New Yorkers. The policy had also raised apprehensions among her fellow Democrats during recent congressional elections. A survey conducted by Siena College in April revealed that about two-thirds of New York State residents were against the program.
The reintroduction of congestion pricing, albeit with a reduced toll of $9 from the earlier proposed $15, has sparked criticism from Republicans eyeing the upcoming governor’s race in 2026. Representative Mike Lawler, who represents a New York suburban district and is speculated to be a gubernatorial candidate, has been particularly vocal in opposing the toll plan and Governor Hochul.
While many Democrats in New York City have welcomed the return of congestion pricing as a pioneering initiative in the country, some suburban Democrats have expressed frustration with the decision. The policy’s revival has the potential to impact Governor Hochul’s chances of re-election.
Overall, the resurrection of congestion pricing in New York has created a contentious debate, with proponents emphasizing its benefits for the environment and transportation systems, and opponents raising concerns about its economic implications and political ramifications.
Source: The NY Times
